Results

Private Market Growth Remained Steady Despite Public Market Volatility

(NOTE: Both the Lincoln PMI and S&P 500 EV returns above reflect enterprise values)
(S&P 500 EV excludes financial companies for which enterprise value is generally not meaningful; however, including such companies produces similar results)

Sector Breakdown

While Valuations Improved Across All Industries, Consumer Again Lagged the Rest

Examining the LPMI

EBITDA Multiples versus Earnings

Examining the LPMI

Lower Middle Market vs Middle Market vs Large Corporate Sub-Indices

(Low includes companies with LTM EBITDA <$20 million, Mid includes companies with LTM EBITDA of $20 million to $50 million and High includes companies with LTM EBITDA $50 million to $250 million)

Summary

The Q3 2025 LPMI

General Observations

• Private company enterprise values increased for the 12th consecutive quarter as the Lincoln PMI increased 2.9%,driven by improved earnings.
• While the growth of the Lincoln PMI was modest relative to the S&P 500, it was similar to that of the S&P 500 after excluding the Magnificent 7, reflecting the greater diversification and smaller exposure to AI in the private markets.
• Since its inception in Q1 2014, the Lincoln PMI has shown that private company enterprise value multiples have been less volatile than public company multiples and that earnings are the primary factor driving long term value creation.

Enterprise Value Results

• All six industries experienced enterprise value growth, although consumer companies continue to lag all other industries given the persistent tariff and inflationary concerns.
• Large companies in the Lincoln PMI continued to drive overall index growth as smaller companies remain hampered by their higher risk and the risk-off sentiment from investors.

Industry Breakdown on an Enterprise Value Basis

• Five of the six industries experienced enterprise value growth for the third consecutive quarter, with only industrials declining in Q2 as a result of growing uncertainty surrounding supply chains as tariff impacts and inflation continue to pressure industrial companies.
• Although technology companies experienced the greatest degree of enterprise value growth over the last twelve months, the rate of growth slowed this quarter, perhaps normalizing.

Methodology

Source of Data and Sample Size

On a quarterly basis, Lincoln determines the enterprise fair value of 6,250+ portfolio companies for more than 225 sponsors (i.e., private equity groups and lenders to private equity groups). These portfolio companies report quarterly financial results to the sponsor or lender. Lincoln obtains this information and determines the appropriate enterprise value multiple so as to compute the enterprise value in accordance with the fair value measurement principles of generally accepted accounting principles. In assessing enterprise value, Lincoln relies on well accepted valuation methodologies such as the market approach and income approach considering each company’s historical and projected performance and other qualitative and quantitative factors. Finally, each valuation is then vetted by auditors, company management, boards of directors and regulators. Upon concluding each quarterly valuation cycle, Lincoln aggregates the underlying financial performance and enterprise value data for analysis.

To construct the Lincoln PMI, Lincoln selects a subsection of the companies valued each quarter, including private companies each generating earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of less than $250.0 million, disregarding venture-stage businesses and non-operating entities, such as special purpose entities that own real estate and specialty finance assets.

For more information, visit https://www.lincolninternational.com/perspectives/an-overview-of-the-lincoln-private-market-index/

Independent Academic Validation of Lincoln’s Data

In January 2024, an assistant professor of finance at Penn State University’s Smeal College of Business conducted a study to evaluate the statistical significance of Lincoln’s private market database as compared to other independent sources, like Pitchbook, BDC Collateral and Preqin. The test was akin to an FDA pharmaceutical drug effectiveness test wherein Lincoln’s data was tested in relation to the independent data sets, measuring overlap of deals detailed and congruency of reported terms. The results were robust and concluded that Lincoln’s data was representative of the private debt universe and comprehensive of sponsor-backed deals in particular. Lincoln’s database featured 53% of reported private debt deals with terms in Pitchbook and 48% of sponsor-backed deals with reported debt terms that appeared in BDC Collateral. However, beyond the abundance of pure deals, Lincoln’s database goes a step beyond and includes vital operating performance figures from the portfolio company-level that the other databases do not feature. Lincoln’s data is relatively more comprehensive, inclusive of EV and financial performance metrics that allow for a much clearer picture of the state of the private markets.

Academic Advisors

Professor Steven Kaplan

Professor Steven Kaplan is a Senior Advisor to Lincoln’s Valuations and Opinions Group. He is the Neubauer Family Distinguished Service Professor of Entrepreneurship and Finance and Kessenich E.P. Faculty Director at the Polsky Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Among other courses, Professor Kaplan teaches advanced Master of Business Administration and executive courses in entrepreneurial finance and private equity, corporate finance, corporate governance and wealth management. Professor Kaplan conducts research on a wide array of issues in private equity, venture capital, corporate governance, boards of directors, mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance. He has been a member of the Chicago Booth faculty since 1988.

Professor Kaplan serves on the board of Morningstar and several fund and company advisory boards. He is also a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Professor Kaplan received a Bachelor of Arts, summa cum laude, in applied mathematics and economics from Harvard College and earned a Doctor of Philosophy in business economics from Harvard University.

Professor Michael Minnis

Professor Michael Minnis is a Senior Advisor to Lincoln’s Valuations and Opinions Group. He is the Deputy Dean for Faculty and Fuji Bank and Heller Professor of Accounting at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, where he researches the role of accounting information in allocating investment efficiently by both managers and capital providers. His recent research focuses on understanding the role of privately held companies in the U.S. economy and how these firms use financial reporting to access, deploy and manage capital. He particularly enjoys identifying unique data and methods to empirically examine issues in a novel way.

In January 2018, Professor Minnis became a member of the Private Company Council, the primary advisory council to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) on private company issues. Professor Minnis received his Ph.D. from the University of Michigan and his B.S. from the University of Illinois, where he graduated with Highest Honors.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE: The Lincoln Private Market Index^TM is an informational indicator only, and does not constitute investment advice or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security. It is not possible to directly invest in the Lincoln Private Market Index. Some of the statements above contain opinions based upon certain assumptions regarding the data used to create the Lincoln Private Market Index, and these opinions and assumptions may prove incorrect. Actual results could vary materially from those implied or expressed in such statements for any reason. The Lincoln Private Market Index has been created on the basis of information provided by third-party sources that are believed to be reliable, but Lincoln International has not conducted an independent verification of such information. Lincoln International makes no warranty or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such third-party information.

The LPMI should not be construed as an offer to sell or buy, or a solicitation to sell or buy, any products linked to the performance of the LPMI. The use of the LPMI in any manner, including for benchmarking purposes, is not endorsed or recommended by Lincoln International and Lincoln International is not responsible for any use made of the LPMI. Lincoln International does not guarantee the accuracy and/or completeness of the LPMI and Lincoln International shall not have any liability for any errors or omissions therein. None of Lincoln International, any of its affiliates or subsidiaries, nor any of its directors, officers, employees, representatives, delegates or agents shall have any responsibility to any person (whether as a result of negligence or otherwise) for any determination made or anything done (or omitted to be determined or done) in respect of the LPMI and any use to which any person may put the LPMI. Lincoln International has no obligation to update the LPMI and has no obligation to investors with respect to any product based on the performance of the LPMI. Any investment in such a product will not acquire an interest in the LPMI. Lincoln International is not an investment adviser and will not provide any financial advice relating to a product linked to the performance of the LPMI. Investors should read any such product offering documentation and consult with their own legal, financial and tax advisors before investing in any such product.

© 2025 Lincoln Partners Advisors LLC. All rights reserved. LINCOLN PRIVATE MARKET INDEX and LINCOLN INTERNATIONAL are service marks owned by Lincoln Partners Advisors LLC and its affiliated entities. Any use of these service marks and these materials, including the reproduction, modification, distribution or republication of these materials, without the prior written consent of Lincoln International, is strictly prohibited.