Results

Private Market Growth Remained Steady Despite Public Market Volatility

(NOTE: Both the Lincoln PMI and S&P 500 EV returns above reflect enterprise values)
(S&P 500 EV excludes financial companies for which enterprise value is generally not meaningful; however, including such companies produces similar results)

Q2’25 YTD LTM CAGR Since Inception
LPMI 2.5% 4.8% 9.8% 7.8%
S&P 500 EV 10.6% 4.4% 11.0% 10.1%
S&P 500 Ex7 EV 6.2% 5.8% 9.5% NA

 

Sector Breakdown

Buoyed by demand for AI and high margins, technology companies outpaced other industries

Industry Q2’25 YTD LTM
Business Services 2.3% 3.7% 7.8%
Consumer 1.3% 2.5% 5.0%
Energy 3.7% 6.5% 13.6%
Healthcare 2.0% 2.6% 7.2%
Industrials -0.7% 5.8% 8.6%
Technology 4.1% 6.2% 11.9%

Examining the LPMI

EBITDA Multiples versus Earnings

40%
Expansion of LPMI valuation multiples since Q2 2014

Examining the LPMI

Lower Middle Market vs Middle Market vs Large Corporate Sub-Indices

(Low includes companies with LTM EBITDA <$20 million, Mid includes companies with LTM EBITDA of $20 million to $50 million and High includes companies with LTM EBITDA $50 million to $250 million)

For the fourth consecutive quarter, all size categories tracked by the Lincoln PMI grew in aggregate; however, the indices continue to see variability within performance trends and the movement of multiples.

While all size categories saw improved fundamental performance, larger companies (i.e. companies with EBITDA > $50 million) continued to grow at a greater rate than smaller companies; this theme aligned with that of the public markets. Smaller companies have experienced the greatest degree of multiple compression. Investors continue to remain focused on larger and higher-quality companies, as smaller companies tend to have less diverse product and service offerings with higher customer or supplier concentration and therefore less stable earnings and higher risk.

Summary

The LPMI

General Observations

  • Private company EV increased for the 11th consecutive quarter as the Lincoln PMI increased 2.5%, driven by improved earnings.
    • Growth of the Lincoln PMI was modest relative to the S&P 500; however, the Lincoln PMI did not experience the same losses that the public markets did in Q1, resulting in H1 2025 public and private market performance generally aligning, ultimately providing empirical evidence of the private market’s insulation from public market’s volatility.
  • Since its inception in Q1 2014, the Lincoln PMI has shown that private company EV multiples have been less volatile than public company multiples and that earnings are the primary factor driving long-term value creation.

Enterprise Value Results

  • The Lincoln PMI experienced steady earnings growth despite the macro uncertainty, especially surrounding tariffs, alluding to the resilience of the private markets.
  • Large companies in the Lincoln PMI continued to drive overall index growth as smaller companies remain hampered by their higher risk and the risk-off sentiment from investors.

Industry Breakdown on an Enterprise Value Basis

  • Five of the six industries experienced enterprise value growth for the third consecutive quarter, with only industrials declining in Q2 as a result of growing uncertainty surrounding supply chains as tariff impacts and inflation continue to pressure industrial companies.
  • Consumer companies saw the lowest enterprise value growth of the six industries from the outset of 2025, given more direct exposure to inflationary headwinds and the slower recovery of consumer spending.

In Summary, we believe the LPMI

  • Enables investors in private companies, including private equity firms, to benchmark their investments against their peers and the S&P 500 on both enterprise value and equity value bases;
  • Demonstrates that private companies generate returns comparable to major public stock market indices with less volatility;
  • Offers many unique valuation insights into the fair value of private companies for a wide array of stakeholders and investors; and
  • Represents a significant enhancement to the information available to investors in private companies.

Methodology

Source of Data and Sample Size

On a quarterly basis, Lincoln determines the enterprise fair value of over 6,250 portfolio companies for over 225 sponsors (i.e., private equity groups and lenders to private equity groups). These portfolio companies report quarterly financial results to the sponsor or lender. Lincoln obtains this information and determines the appropriate EV multiple so as to compute the EV in accordance with the fair value measurement principles of generally accepted accounting principles. In assessing enterprise value, Lincoln relies on well-accepted valuation methodologies such as the market approach and income approach, considering each company’s historical and projected performance and other qualitative and quantitative factors. Finally, each valuation is then vetted by auditors, company management, boards of directors and regulators. Upon concluding each quarterly valuation cycle, Lincoln aggregates the underlying financial performance and EV data for analysis.

To construct the Lincoln PMI, Lincoln selects a subsection of the companies valued each quarter, including private companies each generating earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of less than $250.0 million, disregarding venture-stage businesses and non-operating entities, such as special purpose entities that own real estate and specialty finance assets.

For more information, visit https://www.lincolninternational.com/perspectives/an-overview-of-the-lincoln-private-market-index/

Independent Academic Validation of Lincoln’s Data

In January 2024, an assistant professor of finance at Penn State University’s Smeal College of Business conducted a study to evaluate the statistical significance of Lincoln’s private market database as compared to other independent sources, like Pitchbook, BDC Collateral and Preqin. The test was akin to an FDA pharmaceutical drug effectiveness test wherein Lincoln’s data was tested in relation to the independent data sets, measuring overlap of deals detailed and congruency of reported terms. The results were robust and concluded that Lincoln’s data was representative of the private debt universe and comprehensive of sponsor-backed deals in particular. Lincoln’s database featured 53% of reported private debt deals with terms in Pitchbook and 48% of sponsor-backed deals with reported debt terms that appeared in BDC Collateral. However, beyond the abundance of pure deals, Lincoln’s database goes a step beyond and includes vital operating performance figures from the portfolio company-level that the other databases do not feature. Lincoln’s data is relatively more comprehensive, inclusive of EV and financial performance metrics that allow for a much clearer picture of the state of the private markets.

6,250+
portfolio companies are evaluated by Lincoln on a quarterly basis to determine their enterprise fair value
225+
sponsors participate in LPMI i.e. private equity groups & lenders to private equity groups

 

Academic Advisors

Professor Steven Kaplan

Professor Steven Kaplan is a Senior Advisor to Lincoln’s Valuations and Opinions Group. He is the Neubauer Family Distinguished Service Professor of Entrepreneurship and Finance and Kessenich E.P. Faculty Director at the Polsky Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Among other courses, Professor Kaplan teaches advanced Master of Business Administration and executive courses in entrepreneurial finance and private equity, corporate finance, corporate governance and wealth management. Professor Kaplan conducts research on a wide array of issues in private equity, venture capital, corporate governance, boards of directors, mergers and acquisitions, and corporate finance. He has been a member of the Chicago Booth faculty since 1988.

Professor Kaplan serves on the board of Morningstar and several fund and company advisory boards. He is also a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Professor Kaplan received a Bachelor of Arts, summa cum laude, in applied mathematics and economics from Harvard College and earned a Doctor of Philosophy in business economics from Harvard University.

Professor Michael Minnis

Professor Michael Minnis is a Senior Advisor to Lincoln’s Valuations and Opinions Group. He is the Deputy Dean for Faculty and Fuji Bank and Heller Professor of Accounting at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, where he researches the role of accounting information in allocating investment efficiently by both managers and capital providers. His recent research focuses on understanding the role of privately held companies in the U.S. economy and how these firms use financial reporting to access, deploy and manage capital. He particularly enjoys identifying unique data and methods to empirically examine issues in a novel way.

In January 2018, Professor Minnis became a member of the Private Company Council, the primary advisory council to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) on private company issues. Professor Minnis received his Ph.D. from the University of Michigan and his B.S. from the University of Illinois, where he graduated with Highest Honors.

Meet Our Senior Team

Related Perspectives

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE: The Lincoln Private Market IndexTM is an informational indicator only, and does not constitute investment advice or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security. It is not possible to directly invest in the Lincoln Private Market Index. Some of the statements above contain opinions based upon certain assumptions regarding the data used to create the Lincoln Private Market Index, and these opinions and assumptions may prove incorrect. Actual results could vary materially from those implied or expressed in such statements for any reason. The Lincoln Private Market Index has been created on the basis of information provided by third-party sources that are believed to be reliable, but Lincoln International has not conducted an independent verification of such information. Lincoln International makes no warranty or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such third-party information.

The LPMI should not be construed as an offer to sell or buy, or a solicitation to sell or buy, any products linked to the performance of the LPMI. The use of the LPMI in any manner, including for benchmarking purposes, is not endorsed or recommended by Lincoln International and Lincoln International is not responsible for any use made of the LPMI. Lincoln International does not guarantee the accuracy and/or completeness of the LPMI and Lincoln International shall not have any liability for any errors or omissions therein. None of Lincoln International, any of its affiliates or subsidiaries, nor any of its directors, officers, employees, representatives, delegates or agents shall have any responsibility to any person (whether as a result of negligence or otherwise) for any determination made or anything done (or omitted to be determined or done) in respect of the LPMI and any use to which any person may put the LPMI. Lincoln International has no obligation to update the LPMI and has no obligation to investors with respect to any product based on the performance of the LPMI. Any investment in such a product will not acquire an interest in the LPMI. Lincoln International is not an investment adviser and will not provide any financial advice relating to a product linked to the performance of the LPMI. Investors should read any such product offering documentation and consult with their own legal, financial and tax advisors before investing in any such product.

© 2025 Lincoln Partners Advisors LLC. All rights reserved. LINCOLN PRIVATE MARKET INDEX and LINCOLN INTERNATIONAL are service marks owned by Lincoln Partners Advisors LLC and its affiliated entities. Any use of these service marks and these materials, including the reproduction, modification, distribution or republication of these materials, without the prior written consent of Lincoln International, is strictly prohibited.

 

Q2 2025 Lincoln Private Market Index™

Q2 2025 Results Show Further Confirmation of the Private Market’s Insulation from Public Market Volatility The Lincoln Private Market Index (LPMI), the only index that tracks changes in the enterprise… Read More

Professional & Human Capital Services Market Update Q2 2025

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) volume within the professional services subsectors monitored within the report was up a robust 22.6% on a YoY, last 12-month (LTM) basis as compared to the… Read More

EMS Quarterly Review Q2 2025

In Q2 2025, the electronics manufacturing services (EMS) sector continued to demonstrate operational discipline amid persistent geopolitical uncertainty, tariff-related headwinds and ongoing supply chain realignment. Industry participants accelerated reshoring and… Read More

Fashion & Apparel Market Update Q2 2025

In the second quarter of 2025, the fashion and apparel mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market remained subdued by the same macroeconomic headwinds that weighed on activity in Q1. Trade tariffs… Read More

Packaging Quarterly Review Q2 2025

The packaging industry continues to face persistent cost challenges into 2025. While the rate of inflation has slowed from the post-COVID highs experienced in 2021-2023, it remains the central driver… Read More

Facilities Services Market Update Q2 2025

Q2 2025 marks an increase in overall deal activity compared to Q1 2025. According to S&P Global, approximately ~7,800 deals closed globally in Q2 2025, up ~3% from Q1 with… Read More

Q1 2025 European Lincoln Private Market Index

LINCOLN’S EUROPEAN PMI EKES OUT A GAIN, BUT ONLY BECAUSE EARNINGS GROWTH OFFSET MULTIPLE CONTRACTION FOR THE QUARTER The European Lincoln Private Market Index is the only index which tracks… Read More

Food & Beverage Market Update Q1 2025

Lincoln International is pleased to release its Q1 2025 Food and Beverage Quarterly Review. As we reflect on the first quarter, deal flow across the broader mergers and acquisitions (M&A)… Read More

Q1 2025 Lincoln European Senior Debt Index™

Lincoln International LLC (Lincoln) is pleased to release the latest quarterly Lincoln European Senior Debt Index (ESDI). The ESDI represents years of research and analysis of data and was developed… Read More

Industrial Software Spring 2025 Market Report

Disruptions in the global supply chain have highlighted the importance of high-impact, hard-dollar return on investment supply chain management (SCM) software tools that improve speed, cost, compliance and quality. In… Read More

Q1 2025 Lincoln Senior Debt Index™

Lincoln International LLC (Lincoln) is pleased to release the first quarter 2025 Lincoln US Senior Debt Index (Lincoln US Senior Debt Index, Senior Debt Index, or, LSDI). The Lincoln US… Read More

Q1 2025 Lincoln Private Market Index™

While the Lincoln Private Market Index Grew in Q1, Negative Trends are Brewing The Lincoln Private Market Index (LPMI), the only index that tracks changes in the enterprise value of… Read More

Chemicals Quarterly Review Q1 2025

The first quarter of 2025 saw increasing macroeconomic volatility, as heightened trade tensions under President Trump’s tariff policies shaped market sentiment. In February, the new U.S. administration proposed hefty tariffs… Read More

Transportation & Logistics Market Update Q1 2025

Online Retail Market Update Q1 2025

The online retail sector has gradually recovered from market turbulence and inflationary pressures experienced over the past few years. While sales volumes have not yet returned to pre-pandemic levels, profitability… Read More

Human Capital Services Market Update Q1 2025

The human capital services sector faced a volatile and challenging two quarters leading up to March 2025. While employment stabilized as expected and actual unemployment rates came into balance at… Read More

EMS Quarterly Review Q1 2025

In Q1 2025, the electronics manufacturing services (EMS) industry experienced relatively flat performance amid ongoing macroeconomic headwinds, including persistent inflationary pressure, supply chain volatility, elevated tariff regimes and geopolitical uncertainty.

Fashion & Apparel Market Update Q1 2025

The fashion and apparel sector showed relative stability in Q1 2025, with deal activity holding steady despite ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty and volatility in public markets. Although the broader mergers and… Read More

Consumer Health Quarterly Report Q1 2025

The evolving political and economic landscape is expected to drive strategic realignments, creating both challenges and opportunities that will shape the consumer health M&A market in 2025.

Packaging Quarterly Review Q1 2025

In a major shift toward a more protectionist trade policy, the U.S. administration has announced the implementation of new reciprocal tariffs, including a baseline 10% tariff on all imports (at… Read More

Automotive Aftermarket Intelligence Report Q1 2025

Despite increasing uncertainty, M&A transactions of all sizes continue to change the market, alter supply chain logistics and ultimately support an increasing vehicle population.

Facilities Services Market Update Q1 2025

After a string of quarterly gains, Q1 2025 marks the first decrease in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity since Q3 2023. According to S&P Global, approximately 7,600 deals closed globally,… Read More

Cybersecurity Report: Year-end 2024

In 2024, cybersecurity mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and growth investments saw a massive rebound, fueled by slowing inflation, stable interest rates, healthy spending growth and available capital across a widening… Read More

Q4 2024 Lincoln European Senior Debt Index

Lincoln International LLC is pleased to release the latest quarterly Lincoln European Senior Debt Index (ESDI). The ESDI represents years of research and analysis of data and was developed by… Read More

Chemicals Quarterly Review Q4 2024

The adhesives sector remains a highly coveted sub-segment within the broader chemicals and materials spectrum. The North American market alone accounts for ~$20B of annual turnover and notably serves the… Read More