Getting from A to B: A Roadmap to Freight Forwarding Consolidation

Jan 2020

With the rolling in of a new decade comes the inking of a “phase one” trade deal between the US and China, finally beginning to draw escalating tensions and tit-for-tat tariffs to an anticlimactic close. The trade war has left ripple effects throughout the global freight forwarding space. Last year saw weaker year-over-year performance from top freight forwarding companies as retailers and manufacturers worked through excess inventory accumulated during significant pre-buying activities in 2018 to avoid the impact of potential tariffs. With diminished industrial manufacturing output during the “hangover” in 2019 in the US, but also in key European economies such as Germany, air freight forwarding volumes saw consistent year-over-year declines throughout 2019, whereas sea freight forwarding volume growth remained positive, albeit significantly below the prior year.

The trade wars also reshaped the geographical landscape of the freight forwarding space as some retailers diverted their manufacturing away from China and to countries like Vietnam with favorable manufacturing capacity and cheap labor. In Europe, near-shoring continued to remain a popular solve with European production moving to Central and Eastern Europe or Northern Africa and some US companies turning to low-cost and nearby Mexico. With the shifting of shipping geographies and increased uncertainty (e.g. Brexit, Middle East tensions), cross border M&A activity slowed relative to historical levels as many players focused on domestic opportunities while concurrently developing longer term strategies to diversify their footprints in attractive markets abroad to reduce the potential impact of future trade disruptions.

With all of this in mind, the signing of the trade deal marks a promising start to the year with reduced uncertainty for investors.

 

Bigger is Better: M&A Opportunities Abound

Consolidation is nothing new in the freight forwarding space, with no signs of slowing down anytime soon.

The global forwarding space remains deeply fragmented. In European road forwarding, for example, the top 10 players only hold 10% of market share overall. Even in the more consolidated global air and ocean freight forwarding space, the largest players hold just 41% of the market—leaving the majority ripe for consolidation.

Consolidation appeals to investors looking to enhance their bottom line by:
Building economies of scale – with scale comes the purchasing power and ability to achieve higher capacity and utilization
Expanding global footprints – forwarders can expand their geographical footprint to new destinations
Building end-to-end service capabilities – some use M&A to expand their trade lanes, specialty skills (e.g., transporting perishables) or in order to move toward becoming an end-to-end provider with a global supply chain

 

The market is likely to continue to undergo this flight to scale, which will force small-to-medium sized players to seek larger platforms to remain competitive as requirements to invest in technology, infrastructure, broader footprints and service capabilities accelerate.

 

Four factors to look for in a target:
1 Scale per trade 2 Automation
Key competitive advantages from scale (e.g., negotiation power, treatment by carriers, optimal capacity utilization, etc.)

Scale is relevant per specific trade lanes – but overall scale at company level is not decisive

Integration of automated solutions for capacity management, booking, pricing and CRM

Elimination of paper-based processes
Tech platform for customer interfacing

3 End-to-end service quality 4 Sales force effectiveness
Engender customer loyalty through superior service

End-to-end solutions from warehouse to warehouse comprising of value-added services and supported by advanced IT

Sales staff meeting the needs of the most important customers on a consistent basis

Key account management programs for effective guidance and development of relevant sales skills

 

Tech Disruptors Shake Up Freight Forwarding Space, Making Waves for Traditional Players

Another factor fueling disruption in the freight forwarding space is the emergence of tech platforms looking to eradicate the biggest customer pain points in the industry: price opacity and tedious manual processes.

Many digital freight forwarding start-ups, such as Convoy, Flexport, Turvo and Freighthub, have received significant venture and PE funding amidst record high valuations. The disruption that these innovative players are causing threatens to drastically change the traditional forwarding landscape with pure brokers exiting the market and longstanding traditional forwarders who are slow to embrace the change being displaced by rapidly growing and well-funded new entrants.

But the new innovations that digital startups are bringing to the industry—rate discovery, clear price transparency, track and trace for containers, etc.—also present a ripe opportunity for investors looking to buy and build freight forwarding platforms that can weather the storm of disruption.

Increasingly, we’re seeing traditional freight forwarders embracing technology by either internally developing their own solutions to remain competitive (e.g., Kuehne&Nagel/Freight-Net, Agility/Shipa Freight, Maersk-Damco/Twill Logistics, etc. ) or making strategic investments or forging partnerships with others to stay viable (e.g., DBSchenker/uShip, Maersk/Ali Baba’s One Touch, Geodis/Upply, etc.).

Ultimately, large incumbents that invest in digital technology appear to be best-positioned to prevail combining the benefits of digital with “real-world” door-to-door contract logistics expertise. But at the same time, there will be digital platforms gaining attractive scale in segments of the market, especially the ones that require more standardized services. Many incumbent mid-market players, on the other hand, distinguish themselves by special regional or industry expertise, addressing complex needs such as protective packaging, immediate pickup or temperature control. Still, it will be imperative for them to invest in digitization, enabling efficiency gains as well as interfacing with shippers and carriers directly as well as via the various emerging digital eco-systems.

One takeaway of digitalization seems crystal clear: consolidation. The many emerging startups in the logistics and transportation space will be acquired by investors hungry to build innovative growth platforms for the future and capitalize on the benefits of supply chain optimization. This will allow them (i) to build critical mass both in terms of shippers as well as logistics services providers and (ii) to add relevant tools for enhancing transparency, visibility, collaboration and improved utilization of transport assets.

Lincoln Perspective:

For PE investors and corporates looking to consolidate the forwarding space there is ample opportunity:

 

PE, it’s time to buy and build: The fragmentation of the forwarding industry offers an attractive backdrop for executing a buy-and-build strategy. The key is to develop a focused thesis to invest in specific verticals to establish scale and market leadership. It is more challenging to build a successful platform that is a copy-cat player in many niches, without clear differentiation/leadership in any particular one, as it can be difficult to compete with larger competitors. This approach is also optimal for creating synergetic exit opportunities. It is particularly appealing to overseas corporate serial acquirers seeking external growth complementing (i) regional presence or (ii) skill sets, while (iii) showing sound protection against commoditization.
Corporates, don’t miss out on middle-market targets: While many corporates may be seeking larger scale acquisitions, there are actionable targets that can help to:

  • fill a white space in the market
  • expand to targeted regional geographies (for example, many European players want increased exposure to Asian trade lanes)
  • build scale to negotiate a price advantage; with scarcity of transformational deals for the top players, they often have to look to the midmarket to build their size
  • increase exposure to (cross-border) ecommerce verticals
  • add capabilities in value-added services for specific verticals in addition to forwarding, driving
  • differentiation against the backdrop of commoditization observed in a pure “port-to-port transport organization”

 

Summary

Contributors


Distribution Quarterly Review Q4 2019

2019 was an active year for distribution M&A, outpacing 2018 deal activity despite concerns regarding the impact of tariffs and shifts in buyer sentiment during the year.

Distribution Quarterly Review Q3 2019

While current M&A activity remains high relative to historical levels, a confluence of factors impacting the distribution sector has led to a slight decline in transaction volume year-over-year.

Distribution Quarterly Review Q2 2019

The first half of 2019 yielded significant M&A activity across numerous subsectors within the distribution market, especially among large global corporates and private equity firms.

Q&A: How Labor Market Growth, Export of Services and Horizontalization Across Verticals are Driving Opportunity

View original post from Pitchbook on February 25, 2019 here.                                                 The […]